Bitfinex Argues Why Judge Should Dismiss NYAG Case in Latest Court Filings

Bitfinex and Tether have asked a judge to dismiss the New York Attorney General's case against the controversial cryptocurrency firms, claiming they have no customers in the state.

In new court filings Tuesday, lawyers for the two companies, which have overlapping owners and managers, also asked Judge Joel M. Cohen of the New York Supreme Court to stay the NYAG's "Onerous" request for documents from Bitfinex and Tether while he considers the motion.

The firms "Have nothing to do with New York investors - the businesses do not allow New Yorkers on their platforms and do not advertise or otherwise do business here," attorneys Jason Weinstein and David I. Miller wrote.

Further, the attorney general "Has not identified, even in a general sense, any 'victim' in New York," and the office is using a New York law, the Martin Act, that governs securities and commodities, of which Tether's product, the stablecoin USDT, is neither, the lawyers argued.

Separately, in a hearing last week, Miller let it slip that Tether had previously invested a portion of its reserves in bitcoin.

At some point before the NYAG obtained its preliminary injunction against the companies, "Tether actually did invest in instruments beyond cash and cash equivalents, including bitcoin, they bought bitcoin," Miller told the court, according to a transcript of the May 16 hearing published Tuesday by crypto publication The Block.

It was a notable admission since until recently Tether has maintained that USDT was backed 1-for-1 with U.S. dollars.

"Tether sounded to me like sort of the calm in the storm of cryptocurrency trading," he told Miller, according to the transcript.

"And so if tether is backed by bitcoin, how is that consistent?".

Late last month, the NYAG secured the preliminary injunction freezing Tether's assets and asking for documents about a $625 million loan and a $900 million line of credit it offered to Bitfinex.